Boston ChildCustody Home About Us Practice Areas Contact Us

March 14, 2008

Avoid Common Pitfalls of Alimony Clauses

Thousands of divorce litigants have been tricked into agreeing to alimony that is contingent upon three clauses most commonly used to terminate a payor spouse's obligation to pay. Those three contingencies are normally that alimony terminates in the event of death, event of remarriage or in the event of cohabitation with a non-related romantic interest.

Courts have developed other contingencies to terminate alimony, but these three are the most common. Contingency number one, your death, is the one contingency not worth fighting over. You can't take alimony with you and God doesn't take cash!

Nothing is written in stone, and you do not have to agree to these contingencies. When you agree to a property settlement including alimony, the court will usually accept that agreement and make it part of the divorce, so long as it contains some degree of fairness. Smart spouses insist on all three of these contingencies, but savvy opponents will agree to none. At best, be prepared to compromise.

Think about this: after your divorce is settled, you may want new companionship. Moreover, you need to guard yourself from the tax man by getting the advice of skilled professionals when you decide to choose alimony or property division. Placing contingencies on your ability to receive your fair division of the marital estate creates benefits to one spouse that may prove disastrous to you later on. The bottom-line is this: When seeking alimony in a property settlement agreement, contractually agree with your spouse to minimize the contingent events that may terminate your right to alimony.

August 23, 2007

When One Parent Wants to Move Out-of-State

If you are divorced and you want to move out of state I have one piece of advice for you -- not so fast!

Massachusetts has laws about moving out of state with your children. These laws are referred to as "removal laws." These removal laws deal with when a parent must ask the other parent for consent to remove the child, and when, if the other parent does not contest, the parent who seeks to remove the child must get permission from a judge.

If you and the child's other parent cannot agree, you need to show the judge that the move is in your child's best interests. In order to show that the move is in your child's best interests, you must first show that you have a good and sincere reason for moving and that your reason for moving is not to keep the other parent from having contact with the child.

You must also show that the move is in the child's best interests taking into account all legally relevant factors: how the child's quality of life will be improved and how the custodial parent's quality of life will be improved (from a better job, existence of parental support, etc.).

It will also behoove you to show that the possible effect of reducing or eliminating the child's relationship with the non-custodial parent is not by your own malicious moves and how moving (or not moving) will or will not effect the emotional, physical, or develop mental needs of the child.

Under Massachusetts law, no one of those factors is controlling. The judge considers all of the factors as a whole.

These removal cases are not new to us Call me -- or any of the attorneys at any of our offices or meeting locations -- for help.

Contact us about your legal matter today!









Video Vault
Child Support
Family Law Worksheets
The Child Custody Attorneys
Contact The Child Custody Attorneys

Attorney Web Design The information on this Massachusetts Family Law Group / Law Firm website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this or associated pages, documents, comments, answers, emails, or other communications should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Phone: (800) 910-DIVORCE